Insights on Leadership and Strategic Thinking: A Conversation with Dr. John Hillen

In a rapidly changing world, leadership must evolve to meet new demands, challenges, and opportunities. As the host of The Business of Government Hour, I’ve had the privilege of engaging with visionary leaders who are redefining public service and government. Recently, I spoke with Dr. John Hillen, former Assistant Secretary of State and author of two compelling books: What Happens Next? Reinvent Yourself as a Leader Before Your Business Outruns You and The Strategy Dialogue: Mastering the Art of Business Strategy. Our conversation illuminated the critical inflection points leaders face today—moments when their organizations and careers demand not just adaptation, but reinvention.

Dr. Hillen’s work blends practical tools, seasoned wisdom, and a fresh perspective on leadership evolution. Drawing from his extensive experience, he offers government leaders actionable strategies to foster clarity, align teams, and lead with purpose amid unprecedented complexity. In this post, I distill the core themes from our dialogue and his books, weaving in tailored insights for public sector executives striving to transform challenges into catalysts for progress.

The Leadership Plateau: When Past Success Becomes a Liability

One of the most striking insights from Dr. Hillen’s work is the idea that leaders eventually hit a plateau. In What Happens Next?,  Dr. Hillen argues that many leaders experience a moment when their past success no longer guarantees future effectiveness. They rise through the ranks on the strength of a certain skill set—only to find that those same skills are no longer sufficient to meet the demands of their current role. He describes this as the moment when “your business or organization outruns your leadership.” Organizations scale, industries shift, and leadership demands change. As Dr. Hillen put it:

"Many leaders fail not because they lack talent, but because they keep leading at the level where they last thrived, even as their organization demands more."

This insight is particularly relevant in the public sector, where leaders must manage complexity, bureaucracy, and political dynamics. Government executives often rise through technical expertise or policy acumen but may struggle when they must transition into broader, more strategic roles.

He admits that

“At some point, leaders need to fire their old selves and hire their new selves”

Leaders must proactively reinvent themselves, shifting their mindset, skill set, and leadership approach to match the demands of their evolving organizations. This kind of reinvention requires a willingness to question assumptions, develop self-awareness, and embrace new ways of leading. This means moving from being an operator to a strategist, from a problem solver to an architect of change

Seven Stalls That Sabotage Progress

During our discussion, Dr. Hillen outlined seven common "leadership stalls"—patterns of thinking or behavior that cause leaders to stagnate. One that stood out was the storytelling stall—where leaders assume that just because they’ve articulated a vision, everyone in their organization fully understands and embraces it.

In reality, alignment doesn’t happen automatically. Leaders need to communicate their vision repeatedly, through different channels, and in a way that resonates with their teams. As Dr. Hillen pointed out, leaders often assume that their intent is clear, but if they don’t check for understanding, they risk leading an organization where people are rowing in different directions.

Another stall that struck me was the teamwork stall—where leaders think collaboration is happening simply because teams are meeting and communicating. But as Dr. Hillen explained, collaboration isn't about just gathering people together; it’s about ensuring alignment, accountability, and shared purpose.

During our discussion, Hillen made in interesting distinction between challenges of complexity and those of sophistication. While complexity involves scaling up existing tasks (e.g., more FTEs, bigger budgets), sophistication requires a fundamental change in mindset, behaviors, and even organizational culture. For instance, a leader might need to shift from reorganization to simply empowering teams to think and act in novel ways—fostering innovation without always resorting to structural changes.

For government executives, these insights are particularly relevant. Many agencies operate in complex, matrixed environments where collaboration across departments is critical. Yet, without deliberate effort to overcome these stalls, leaders may find themselves managing inertia instead of driving progress

Fewer, Better Decisions: The Power of Strategic Delegation

Another key theme we explored was decision-making—and the idea that leaders should focus on making fewer, but better, decisions. Dr. Hillen argued that too many leaders get bogged down in operational details, leaving them little time for the high-impact, strategic choices that truly shape the future of an organization. He encourages leaders to delegate more, not just as a means of efficiency, but to empower their teams and build a stronger leadership bench.

His advice is striking:

"Your leadership legacy isn’t the sum of the decisions you make—it’s the sum of the decisions you enable others to make."

For government executives, this shift is both a challenge and an opportunity. Bureaucratic tendencies pull leaders toward micromanagement, yet trusting teams with clear decision-making frameworks can unlock agility and innovation. It’s about stepping back to see the horizon while equipping others to navigate the terrain.

Strategy as Dialogue, Not Doctrine

The second half of our discussion shifts the focus to strategic thinking and execution while exploring his most recent book, The Strategy Dialogues. This isn’t your typical strategy manual. Hillen eschews formulaic answers for a dialogue-driven approach, inviting readers to a “front-row seat to a strategy workshop workshops” where leaders wrestle with real-world problems. “I realized people understand strategy when they go back and forth,” he told me. Inspired by Socratic questioning and ancient texts like Plato’s dialogues and the Confucian analects, he demystifies strategic management and reframes strategy not as a static document but as an ongoing conversation—one that leaders should continuously cultivate.

Too often, strategic planning is treated as an annual exercise, producing thick reports that sit on a shelf. Instead, he advocates for embedding strategic thinking into everyday leadership conversations. Key themes we unpacked include:

• Strategy as Mindset. Strategy isn’t a one-time plan but a continuous, deliberate process requiring focus and practice. It isn’t a “what to think” solution, but a “how to think” process. “It’s not a brilliant idea generation game,” he said. “It’s a disciplined way to ask the right questions.” This resonates in government, where leaders often inherit directives rather than shape them.
• The Dialogue Advantage. Effective strategy emerges from structured conversations that align stakeholders and clarify intent. Strategic clarity emerges from intensive back-and-forth. Hillen recounted probing executives: “That’s a goal, not a strategy,” pushing them to define a game plan for advantage, not just aspirations. “In the course of this, they’ll realize what strategy really is,” he noted—a blueprint to move to a better place.
• Mapping the Ecosystem. A standout tool is mapping the ecosystem—understanding who’s doing what and how it connects to your mission. At the State Department, Hillen mapped counterterrorism players (Pentagon, USAID, Treasury) to uncover gaps, collaborating with General David Petraeus to fill them. “It’s different than the org chart,” he emphasized, a critical insight for siloed agencies.
• Practical Frameworks for Action. His 35-word strategy statement—defining objectives, scope, and advantage—offers a concise anchor for alignment. Translating this into action requires process, not pronouncements, confronting ambiguity head-on.
• Shaping the Future. “Wouldn’t you rather prepare for—and even shape—the future than let it happen like the weather?” Hillen asked. It’s a clarion call for proactive leadership in a reactive world.

Hillen’s eclectic background—from commanding troops in Desert Storm to steering corporate turnarounds—grounds his insights in real-world stakes. He notes that only 4% of executives naturally link daily choices to long-term outcomes, a gap The Strategy Dialogue seeks to close by “activating that muscle” in every leader

Takeaways for Government Leaders

Our conversation crystallized several imperatives for public sector leadership:

• Self-awareness is critical. Leaders must be attuned to when their leadership style is becoming mismatched with their organization’s needs and recognize when their style misaligns with their organization’s trajectory, adapting before obsolescence sets in.
• Strategic agility matters. Government executives must cultivate an ongoing dialogue about strategy, ensuring adaptability in a rapidly changing environment. Embedding ongoing strategic dialogue ensures adaptability in turbulent times—a must for agencies facing shifting mandates and crises.
• Reinvention is a necessity, not an option. Just as organizations evolve, so too must their leaders—embracing new skills, perspectives, and leadership models.

The insights offered in our conversation serve as a powerful reminder: leadership is not a fixed destination but a continuous journey of growth, adaptation, and strategic engagement. It is not about clinging to past successes; it’s about continuously evolving and guiding organizations toward a more innovative and strategically sound future.

In an era of constant change, the ability to think strategically and foster innovative dialogue is not just a competitive advantage—it’s essential for the sustainable success. By applying these insights and practical tools, public sector leaders can transform challenges into opportunities, ensuring that they—and the organizations they lead—remain resilient and adaptive in the face of uncertainty.